

What documentation do organizations use to facilitate vendor selection for multi-dimensional projects? The simplest answer is an RFP. During my early tenure working on procurement projects, I quickly recognized the value of RFPs to the success of the project. If you are preparing for PMP certification training, as taught in the Techademy PMP certification course, this will certainly grant you an advantage for RFP processing, which you will encounter frequently in most vendor relationship management.
A Request for Proposal (RFP) is the first formal business document an organization receives that contains detailed proposals by prospective vendors and/or service providers. The document lists the specifications of the project to be undertaken, the expectations of the organization, the criteria for selection of the service provider, and how to objectively compare different service providers. Proposal professionals report that the proposal processes are suboptimal; thus, RFPs are essential in project management.
In project management, a Request for Proposal (RFP) serves as the foundation for selecting a vendor for the project's particular tasks. It is like a vendor invitation as the project manager informs them of the project's needs, timeframes, and response procedures. This document serves a greater purpose than honorary paperwork, as it helps in the search for the right vendor for the project.
The purpose of an RFP is to define and detail the needs and expectations of a project in addition to the selection criteria for the appropriate vendors for the project. This serves as a framework for openness within the organizational structure, to stimulate healthy competition, and to communicate effectively with the prospective vendors and the organization. When executed effectively, the RFP process saves time and costs while providing a greater value to the outcome of the project.
In project management, an RFP is appropriate for a) complex projects that need specialized expert resources, b) projects that will lead to a high-value contractual agreement, which is above the organization's level of authority, and c) projects whose solutions are ambiguous and for which vendor innovation is essential. Other instances for the RFP are when there is a need for competitive bid submission for the purpose of cost reduction, and when there are long-term relationships with the organization in which a comprehensive evaluation of the vendor is needed. For instance, when a new software system is to be launched, a website is to be redesigned, or enterprise-wide solutions are to be implemented, an RFP facilitates and organizes systemized exploration of all possible options.
In this step, the problem and objectives must be clear, as all the work from this point hinges on that clarity. I find the most successful RFPs come from easily identifiable project goals. With the stakeholders, one must answer the following questions: What problem are we solving? What does success look like? And what is the budget?
In this step as well, one must draft the project management plan for the project and set the metrics by which success will be measured. As well, assign all the stakeholders who have control over the vendors, and from this step on, keep the groundwork solid and clear in order to save time and resources in the future
This is where the magic happens. Your RFP document should include:
During this step, make sure to keep the language simple and to the point. Try to keep jargon to a minimum, and if used, define the terms. Proposals that are ambiguous will lead to a submission.
Prior to disseminating RFPs, understand which vendors in the marketplace are most likely to succeed, and research vendors to understand their past performance, including case study submissions and reference checks; this will help you build a targeted vendor list to save time and increase the quality of proposals received.
Once the RFP has been finalized, disseminate your RFP to the appropriate email lists, procurement portal, or industry networking group. Set reasonable deadlines for RFP submissions, as for complex procured items, three to four weeks is usually appropriate to allow vendors to provide complete and thorough proposals.
Vendors will likely have questions, and it is to their benefit as well as yours to help them understand the procurement so that their proposals are more responsive and relevant. Hold organized Question and Answer (Q&A) sessions, and document the questions as well as your responses so that all of the participating vendors receive the same information in the interest of fairness and transparency.
Vendors need to feel confident that their proposals are going to be kept confidential throughout the evaluation process. Electronic systems, or physical mail, must have a process of time-stamping and securely storing proposals that have been received in a manner that ensures confidentiality and security to all. Clearly state your policy on accepting and not accepting late submissions to be consistent.
With all the training and the skills elaborated in the previous steps, it is time to apply them all to evaluation and award. Construct an evaluation matrix, and based on your chosen criteria, as you would in a PMP certification course, such as:
| Criteria for Awarding the Bid | Weights | Info Required |
| Technical Skills | 35% | Quality and originality for the problem provided |
| Cost | 25% | Value of the total project and the costs involved |
| Experience | 20% | Projects in the past and the relevance of the impacts |
| Timeliness | 10% | Realistic solution for the delivery |
| Qualifications of the Team | 10% | Credentials and other relevant skills |
Vendors have to outbid one another, which creates an RFP. Obtaining high-level services and, in turn, the developed commitments is a result of a high level of competition. I have experienced one instance where, through several competitive RFP processes, the project was able to save 15-30%.
An audited trail is one of the advantages that RFPs create. Unequivocal allocation of information to all bidders, and certain criteria are set in advance for selection. This level of transparency eliminates bias from your system.
Identifying/mitigating risks is made possible through healthy vetting of the bidders of an RFP. Project failure risks are reduced through due diligence. Vendors must prove capabilities, demonstrate methodologies and provide references.
Writing RFPs is an intense process that takes a lot of time and effort. The most effective approach here is using templates and customising them to your organization's needs. Engaging subject matter experts (SMEs) early and ensuring that they have time to provide their input and feedback (over a period of about 2-4 weeks, which is the general timeframe that takes for large-scale RFPs) is essential.
Depending on the popularity of your RFP, you may receive dozens of proposals. To avoid overwhelm, implement a two-step approach, where you conduct an initial screening to qualify candidates before moving on to an in-depth review of their proposals.
Occasionally, and for a variety of reasons, the requirements for the project may change after the RFP has been launched. In such cases, all vendors must be made aware of the amendments in a formal manner, and all changes must be accompanied by deadline extensions. Informal changes should be avoided completely as they may give some vendors an unfair advantage.
Having a basic understanding of all the relevant documents helps you streamline the process:
1. RFP (Request for Proposal)
2. RFI (Request for Information)
3. RFQ (Request for Quotation)
For those pursuing PMP exam preparation, the differences outlined here are often the basis for procurement exam questions.
A simplified RFP example describes the situation of procuring new project management software:
This would be supplemented by the RFP document containing additional technical details, specific integration needs, requirements for training, and metrics for success.
Shashank Shastri is a PMP trainer with over 14 years of experience and co-founder of Oven Story. He is an inspiring product leader who is a master in product strategies and digital innovation. Shashank has guided many aspirants preparing for the PMP examination thereby assisting them to achieve their PMP certification. For leisure, he writes short stories and is currently working on a feature-film script, Migraine.
QUICK FACTS
Any comprehensive project should take about 8 - 12 weeks. This breaks down into 2 - 3 weeks for drafting, 3 - 4 weeks to wait for vendor responses, 2 - 3 weeks for evaluation, and 1 - 2 weeks for the negotiation and awarding of the project.