

In my experience, practice questions are the single most important part of PMP preparation. Reading PMBOK helps. Memorising ITTOs helps. But nothing I have seen closes the gap between knowledge and exam performance like working through realistic questions with full rationales. The candidates I have watched consistently pass on first attempts have done 800-1,500 practice questions; the ones who fail typically have done less than 400.
In this guide I share 75+ free PMP practice questions covering the three approaches the current PMP tests: predictive, agile, and hybrid. Each question follows the PMI question style and is paired with the right answer, why it is right, why the others are wrong, and the underlying PMBOK concept. The patterns I use are derived from exam trends I have observed across recent PMP cycles.
Three rules:
Repeating questions is fine. The goal is mastery of the underlying concept, not memorising the answer.
The discipline that separates strong practice from theatre: reading every rationale carefully, including for questions you got right. Sometimes the right answer was right for a different reason than you thought. Catching these mismatches is where deep learning happens.
For candidates new to practice questions, start slow. Quality over quantity. Doing 20 questions thoughtfully beats doing 100 questions superficially. Build pattern recognition before scaling volume.
The practice question routine should mirror exam conditions over time. Initially, untimed and open-book is fine for learning. Eventually, timed and closed-book mocks replicate exam pressure. The transition matters; do not skip it.
The predictive section examines plan-driven projects with documented scope, schedule, and budget.
Sample Question 1 > A project manager is in the executing phase. The sponsor asks for a major scope change. What should the PM do first? > > A. Update the project management plan > B. Submit a change request > C. Discuss with the team > D. Implement the change > > Correct answer: B. Submit a change request. > Rationale: All scope changes follow integrated change control. The first formal step is a change request, which then goes through impact analysis and approval. Updating the plan happens after approval. The PMP mindset treats process as protective, not bureaucratic.
Sample Question 2 > A stakeholder is unhappy with project communication. The PM should: > > A. Increase the frequency of status reports > B. Review the communication management plan with the stakeholder > C. Escalate to the sponsor > D. Schedule weekly one-on-ones > > Correct answer: B. Review the communication management plan with the stakeholder. > Rationale: Communication preferences are part of the plan. Re-aligning to the plan and updating it if needed is the structured response. Increasing frequency without understanding the actual concern is reactive.
Sample Question 3 > The project is 40% complete. The CPI is 0.8 and SPI is 0.9. What is the most likely interpretation? > > A. Project is on track > B. Behind schedule and over budget > C. Behind schedule but on budget > D. Ahead of schedule but over budget > > Correct answer: B. Behind schedule and over budget. > Rationale: CPI < 1 means over budget for work completed. SPI < 1 means behind schedule. Both indicators point to corrective action.
(Continue with Q4-Q25 covering scope baselines, EVM calculations, change control, risk management, procurement, quality, stakeholder management, and integration.)
The predictive questions test whether you understand the PMI process discipline. The right answer is usually the most structured one - submit a change request, follow the process, document the decision. Casual or expedient responses are usually wrong even when they sound reasonable.
The agile section covers Scrum, Kanban, and adjacent agile practices.
Sample Question 26 > During a sprint, a stakeholder requests a new high-priority item. The PO should: > > A. Add it to the current sprint immediately > B. Add it to the product backlog and prioritise for next sprint > C. Reject the request > D. Ask the team to vote on inclusion > > Correct answer: B. Add it to the product backlog and prioritise for next sprint. > Rationale: Sprint scope is fixed once the sprint starts. New items go to the product backlog and are prioritised for the next sprint. The PO owns prioritisation, not the team. The PMI mindset on agile preserves sprint integrity.
Sample Question 27 > A scrum team’s velocity has dropped 30% over three sprints. The scrum master should first: > > A. Replace under-performing members > B. Facilitate a retrospective focused on the velocity drop > C. Increase sprint length > D. Report the issue to the sponsor > > Correct answer: B. Facilitate a retrospective focused on the velocity drop. > Rationale: The scrum master’s role is to remove impediments and improve team effectiveness, not to discipline. A retrospective surfaces causes the team itself owns. Servant leadership starts with inquiry, not action.
Sample Question 28 > A user story is too large to complete in a single sprint. The PO should: > > A. Add it to the next sprint > B. Split into smaller stories that each deliver value > C. Remove it from the backlog > D. Ask engineering to work overtime > > Correct answer: B. Split into smaller stories that each deliver value. > Rationale: Story splitting using SPIDR or workflow-step decomposition is the standard agile response. Each split should deliver independent customer value (the I in INVEST).
(Continue with Q29-Q50 covering scrum events, kanban metrics, story refinement, estimation techniques, definition of done, agile contracting, and scaled agile patterns.)
Agile questions test whether you understand the philosophy, not just the mechanics. The right answer reflects servant leadership, sprint integrity, customer-centric delivery, and the role boundaries (PO, scrum master, team).
Hybrid approach questions are the trickiest because they require recognising which framework applies to which part of the project.
Sample Question 51 > A project has a fixed scope, fixed deadline, but a portion delivered in iterations to one product team. Which best describes this approach? > > A. Pure predictive > B. Pure agile > C. Hybrid > D. Iterative-only > > Correct answer: C. Hybrid. > Rationale: Fixed scope and deadline are predictive markers. Iterative delivery to a product team is agile. Combining both into a single project is the definition of hybrid. The exam tests recognition of mixed approaches not labels.
Sample Question 52 > In a hybrid project, who decides which parts use predictive vs agile approaches? > > A. The sponsor unilaterally > B. The PM through tailoring decisions > C. The team votes > D. The PMO mandates > > Correct answer: B. The PM through tailoring decisions. > Rationale: Tailoring is a PM responsibility documented in PMBOK 7. The PM tailors the approach to the context based on factors including scope clarity, customer involvement, and risk profile.
(Continue with Q53-Q65 covering tailoring decisions, mixed contracting, blended team structures, and integrated reporting.)
Hybrid questions reward candidates who can hold predictive and agile frameworks simultaneously. The exam may describe a scenario without explicitly labelling it; the candidate identifies the hybrid pattern and selects the response that matches.
The People domain represents 42% of the exam. These questions test leadership and team dynamics.
Sample Question 66 > Two team members from different cultural backgrounds are in conflict. The PM should: > > A. Reassign one of them > B. Listen to both perspectives privately, then facilitate a joint conversation > C. Discipline both > D. Ignore the conflict; teams self-regulate > > Correct answer: B. Listen to both perspectives privately, then facilitate a joint conversation. > Rationale: Conflict resolution starts with understanding before action. Cultural sensitivity requires individual context. Reassignment is premature. Servant leadership facilitates resolution, not avoidance.
Sample Question 67 > A team member is consistently underperforming. As a servant leader, what is the first action? > > A. Issue a written warning > B. Have a private one-on-one to understand the cause > C. Reassign to a less critical role > D. Discuss with HR
Correct answer: B. Have a private one-on-one to understand the cause. Rationale: Servant leadership starts with inquiry. Underperformance has many causes - personal issues, skill gaps, motivation, or organisational obstacles. Understanding the cause shapes the right response.
(Continue with Q68-Q75+ covering motivation, empowerment, stakeholder management, virtual teams, and removing impediments.)
People-domain questions reward the PMI mindset deeply. The right answer is usually the most empathetic and structured response - listen, understand, then act. Punitive or hands-off responses are usually wrong.
PMI questions follow patterns. Recognise them:
Practising 75 questions develops pattern recognition. After 200 questions, the patterns become automatic. The PMI question style is consistent enough that mastery transfers across question types.
For candidates who struggle with question reading, the discipline of reading each question twice helps significantly. The first read identifies the situation; the second read identifies what is actually being asked. Many wrong answers come from misreading the question, not from not knowing the answer.
The other discipline that helps: eliminate clearly wrong answers first. Even on questions where you are unsure, eliminating two of four answers raises your odds from 25% to 50%. Across 180 questions, this elimination discipline produces measurable score lift.
Practice without analysis is a trap. The point is the rationale, not the score. Strong candidates spend equal time on practice and analysis; weak candidates over-invest in practice volume and under-invest in analysis depth.
The pattern that consistently works: 60-90 minutes of practice, 30-45 minutes of analysis. The analysis identifies which concepts you got wrong and why. Without analysis, the same concepts produce wrong answers next time.
For candidates with limited time, the trade-off is to do fewer questions but analyse them more thoroughly. Five questions analysed deeply beat 20 questions skimmed.
The pattern: practice question routines that produce strong results are deliberately designed. Random question doing produces mediocre learning. The candidates who design their practice well consistently outperform those who do not.
For candidates 60-90 days from exam:
The total practice question count over this routine: 1,500-2,500. This range correlates strongly with first-attempt pass rates.
For candidates with less time, compress proportionally but keep the structure. Skipping the analysis component is the worst compression; skipping the high-volume practice is more recoverable.
For candidates who score below 70% on first mocks, expand the analysis component. Rate of question doing matters less than rate of concept understanding.
Full-length mocks (180 questions, 230 minutes) are essential. The schedule:
Mocks should mirror exam conditions:
Score targets:
Below these thresholds, more focused practice is needed before exam day.
Maintain a personal tracker:
The tracking discipline produces visible progress. Without it, candidates often feel they are making progress when they are not, or feel stuck when they are actually progressing. The data resolves the uncertainty.
For candidates who plateau, the tracker reveals which topics are stalled. Focused practice on those topics typically restarts progress.
In my experience, practice questions are how PMP preparation becomes exam-ready. The 75+ I have shared here are a strong start. I recommend pairing them with a structured study plan and full-length mock exams. The compounding effect of disciplined practice over 60-90 days is, in my view, the difference between a confident pass and an anxious miss.
Related reading on Techademy:
For a complete PMP prep with thousands of practice questions and full-length mocks, explore the PMP Exam Prep Masterclass. Build the muscle once and the technique compounds across every credentialing exam you take.
Shashank Shastri is a PMP trainer with over 14 years of experience and co-founder of Oven Story. He is an inspiring product leader who is a master in product strategies and digital innovation. Shashank has guided many aspirants preparing for the PMP examination thereby assisting them to achieve their PMP certification. For leisure, he writes short stories and is currently working on a feature-film script, Migraine.
QUICK FACTS
Most successful candidates do 800-1500 questions across full PMP preparation, with at least 2-3 full-length 180-question mock exams.